imminently, page-2

imo, they avoid looking past monash because there's nothing in it for them out of house.

We elected these blokes to do their very best for share holders,,, not some cloak and dagger mates rates in house sort of a contrivance with seemingly reckless abandon or avoidance when it comes to '' other potential players''

How else can this monash relationship be explained ?

No penalties for continuous delivery failures. No comprehensive detail. No showing of monash in the top 40 after the $500k hit the books. No ''in good faith CSI proactive escrow of monash shares ( what happened to the 500k's worth of shares supposedly issued to a monash related entity,,,)

You would think we would be hearing about Loy Yang, and their requirements to fulfill by August,,a carbon reduction plan in order for them to comply No Later Than (NLT) MID SEP for their lions share of the $1.2B GOVT carbon offset grant.

You would think Loy Yang, would fess up 100% of $70m IF,, they could aquire a completed DFT,,,SO THAT,,, they could receive from the GOVT '' TICKS IN BOXES,,,PLUS,,, AROUND HALF A BILLION DOLLARS C TAX OFFSET !!!!
( or are they playing the numbers risk game too,, hoping the Libs drop the Labs C tax regime AND the mining super tax,,another thread in itself )

BUT,,,,, this would mean esi would be licensed IP sellers.

THIS IS WHAT THEY STATED ESI WERE ALL ALONG,,, NOT FLAMING PLANT OWNERS AND RUNNERS.

When Koz was boss and Ash was BM operations manager,,, the pair of em near burnt ESI into oblivion,,, yet they seem to think they have the expetise to Majority own a CDP ??

Or,,, was the BM plant burn down of half a million bux worth of SHARE HOLDER FUNDED FOLLY just a way for the monash lover boys,, to kill off Koz,, and invent a monash backed future...

This clip sums up dream team core philosophy imo.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=R6B9YXhZPrM

We all have one,,, but abusing share holder value in order to get your own way is reckless if effected imo.

e&oe RD