Unfortunately to me the entire story sounds contrived and fake...
This apparent drip-drip of some newly discovered character willing to claim he/she maybe might remember something or not from 30 years ago when he/she did not immediately come forward when the claim was first made some months ago and also said nothing for 30 years doesnt pass the smell test of contrived falsehood with me...
If there was a paper trail of complaints made at the time (absent) - and maybe even the many thousands of witnesses who would certain been made aware of something involving a high profile figure of that order at the time if it indeed happened (absent)... - or a consistent complaint brought up again and again over the past 30 years (absent)
Then their might be slightly more credence to this wacky story...
