hahaha stawb, you know just as well as anyone that ML just missed the ( in front of the 24 given the answer he had was as if it was there. There was a ) after the 60
In any case it didn't take away from the main idea of his post in which he calculated the proper rate of flow per minute for 700 barrels
You just wanted to try and stick the boot in because ML has been posting some things you haven't agreed with over the past few days.
trading halt, page-53
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 21 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
