what interested policein gillard 2gb interview, page-65

  1. 6,746 Posts.
    Playing us with sham answers is the cause of the level of distrust in this government

    And that distrust isn't going away

    So why is everything associated with our esteemed PM smell so fishy?

    Could we assume that someone inside her company requested the POA after the purchase to tidy up or "legitimize" the transaction for the loan to be approved by those higher up?... maybe to protect partner funds if they were making them available?

    Or was there no real trust among the individuals?

    Or was it just an amateurish naive person doing a slip shod unimportant job for a mate?

    And got scared of being caught?

    Is there a more cynical reason?

    Was it a cover up so the bosses/senior partners didn't find out?

    Or so the legitimate union wouldn't find out?

    Did someone higher up attempt to "fix" the wayward transaction with the required and proper paperwork after the event?

    If so... Who was that?

    Did they know about the WA sham setup?

    Did they attempt a coverup?

    If so then who was involved in that coverup?

    Is there some serious domino consequences or implications from others if what appears to be simple questions are answered in a clear concise manner?

    So many questions that do need answers that may only be uncovered by a royal commission

    Clear the air so we can regain our confidence to trust those that govern us... that take our money and spend our money

    My opinion G49
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.