it's rapidly becoming crystal clear that the b, page-66

MD ... my humble understanding is that the relationship between the ASX and a listed compnay is a contractual relationship. Continuous disclosure is a contractual obligation. On this basis IMO if AGS is not disclosing relevant material then it is breach of that contract.

and as I may have repeated any number of times, just because someone says that its confidential, at law, that may not be the case.

i have worked with american coys before and am familiar with their confidentiality clauses and methods. it is in reality a ruse ... the only secrets they invariably have is that they have no secrets!

so if I was to extend the logic, and I were the good justice m, having seen the material, i might conclude that Heathgate are being paranoid, and that is not worthy of compromising the integrity of an international market place (ASX) in which case the order is lifted and rules of court apply ... all material is public!

yee of little faith ...

all guessing!