great news ahead and strategies for sp growth., page-20

Elsee, it may indeed seem like "collusion" if we were all agreeing to SET a price. However the price will not be set, the price at which us shareholders would like to sell our shares is entirely up to us shareholders. It is merely a "discussion" about what we would like as an outcome. Afterall that is what Trading forums were designed for. If people only want to use them to piss and moan, then they are wasting their time on here. If ten shareholders each wish to sell 100000 shares anytime they traded and they thought that their share were worth 1c, then it's up to those ten traders to place their order. If the rest of the market thinks that they should remove their holdings from the market for the time being then they have the right to. Ten more may later then decide their shares are worth 2c and so on and so on. This is normal trading with people discussing values, it is not collusion if it is done in this manner. It would be collusion if we controlled the majority of the shareholding and we all devised a plan to not allow others into the market.
Fleegle, it's not a stupid thread mate, it silly if you don't realise the amount of shares that hotcopper users hold as a whole. It accounts for a fair percentage. Might as well help out our own whatsoever from retreating. We obviously can't guarrantee everyone will share the same views on these "discussions" but how would you ever get anywhere unless you made reasonable effort.
Yes I agree, get to the AGM today if you can, it should be a good one. But we still need to have these discussions where we can, to allow our shareholders to have some say in what they think their shares are worth.
We are all business owners here and one would be silly to allow shares to be sold below the true potential value. Once this project is proven and it will be very shortly, anyone who sold out prior will be dissapointed. In my opinion people are already selling for less then what they should be.