who is buying? , page-16

Is that number right? $110m for the three brands combined ? I think shareholders would hope that analyst is wildly wrong - because if he's right even triple the valuation of those brands would struggle to cover the gross bank debt.

I've been pretty negative on BBG for a while - anyone taking an objective look could see its brands and assets weren't worth too much relative to their debt load, despite what's often posted here. But even I thought they would be worth a bit more than that.

That must be the most gloomy analyst view yet.