do we listen to our chairman or “non-holder"?

Should we listen to our chairman or a “non-holder"?

Good question?

Do we take notice of a “non-holder” who makes wild statements like:
“The stock rose on hype and is now falling on facts” - without providing any “facts”.

Or

Do we take notice of our chairman who has stated that:
“tremendous progress has been made over the last couple of years” and on top of that has forked out, not $100,000 but a massive $1,000,000 to increase her investment.

I know who to ignore!

Fundamentals are excellent and I am sure that we all (including “non-holder”) hope that all continues that way. Many boxes already ticked – not many more to go.

The current share price is meaningless. Has been engineered on very very low volumes

Good to see “non-holder” so interested in this wonderful stock - and why would he not be? PRR has achieved much in the last couple of years and is destined for greatness – in my opinion. Always a good sign when “non-holders” hang around.

Before I finish, let me list some of the “negatives” that “non-holder will probably come up with – just to save him time.

Dubai.
MR leaving as CEO
MR selling some shares
Dr Frazer departing
NASDAQ
SPP under subscribed
Options entitlement (likely to be) under subscribed
Current share price – (have a look at his last post)
Plus Plus

Some of the above so called “negatives” are in fact positives. More important, however is the fact that they are ALL irrelevant to moving forward with the important task of taking CVac to commercialisation.

Exciting times ahead!

Holders will be well rewarded in the not to distant future – in my opinion.

Out for the day - Go Cvac!