wellington capital to take pif to high court, page-19

And a NO vote for ARL leaves Hutson's WC still in breach of PIF's constitution. Aren't we then in a position to pick anyone WE want to liquidate our assets?

So why is the ARL deal a good deal? Because Hutson says so?!!!!

Do we know how far and wide Hutson's WC looked for someone to "agree" to Hutson's high assets valuations only to then massively write them down?

How much competition would there be to flog off our assets if the applicants didn't also have to first also "agree" to Hutson WC's valuations ?

Liquidating $50-$100million of assets. I bet there'll be 'specialists' a hundred deep the width of this country with their hands up for that gig.