Hi LWR I guess thats a slightly different question - what is normal reporting for development vs exploration well, and should the company take the opportunity to provide some positive vibe to the message? I agree it would be good if the company would add some positive tone, every little bit of confidence helps. But let's face it SSN's anns have always been rather dry.
I think you make a good point about the cashflow of drilling 4wells before seeing any production revenue versus the cost savings of the pad drilling process. My view is if the company has a good cash position, then the cashflow isnt an issue, and so do the 4 well sequence to save costs. But thats not the situation Samson is in - cashflow is critical because it is not in a strong cash position - therefore the cost savings from the 4 well sequence dont outweigh the benefit of earlier production revenue coming on stream - I scratch my head to think how under the currenr circumstances the opposite could be true.
If the company runs low on cash and cant complete the 4 wells, I cant see only see two options:
1. Sell one of the other assets or part thereof
2. Sell a higher WI stake to one of the other Nth Stockyard partners to get Samson's contribution over the line.
Let's hope neither is required.
Cheers, Sharks.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- SSN
- Ann: Operational Advisory
Ann: Operational Advisory , page-15
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 4 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)