re: Ann: AJM: Decision to Mine for Mt Webber ... Why is it a profitable move? They are paying $146m for extra 3Mt capacity, so before the mine is up and running they are already down $146m.
Now to recoup that $146m + interest in 10 years, they will have to make at least $7/t profit for the 3Mt per year to make the money back (repaying $20M per year, total debt + interest = 200M after 10 years), and that is JUST to get the money back.
Now if we want to generate a 5% return on top (that's what I can do if they pay that money out as dividend and I put it in a bank instead) then will have to make extra $5/t profit, so total will have to make per tonne profit $10/t to make it generate a poor 5% return over 10 years.
Even right now AGO is probably barely making $10/t profit on existing mine, good luck trying to run a costlier mine(cash cost of $56/t vs $50/t now) in a widely tipped lower iron ore price environment and try to make $10/t profit out of it.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGO
- Ann: Decision to Mine for Mt Webber Iron Ore Proj
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.
Currently unlisted public company.
The Watchlist
FBM
FUTURE BATTERY MINERALS LIMITED
Nick Rathjen, MD & CEO
Nick Rathjen
MD & CEO
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online