"I wish that the figures we have been given as being representative of our Copper equivalents didn't include IO for now"
I think the cobalt cu/eq is a bigger issue - a large part of 245mt bulk tonnage at the .2% cut off is only viable because of the Cu/co eq - I think they really need to subtract the cobalt and report it seperately - its a much bigger contiributor than the magnetite
hOOt
cudeco matters, page-28
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 38 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)