Wheres can this UPI article be found that everyone keeps referring to??
The Drudge report times out.
SRS
spicers limited
Add to My Watchlist
0.00%
!
7.1¢
!
7.1¢
interview
-
-
Share
These guys absolutely suck. I'm sick of them, they are a cancer on the Earth. Do not let them in what ever you do. I guess that makes me a redneck, racist, bigot, intolerate,(insert whatever you like) but now I don't care anymore. THey can all f#@%k off....
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Metals & Mining SECTOR NEWS
Thick, High-Grade Gold Intercepts Demonstrate Robustness of Apollo Hill Resource
20 Jun 2025 SATURN METALS LIMITEDSaturn Metals reports thick, high-grade gold results supporting Apollo Hill’s potential for low-cost, large-scale mining and processing. In addition, a significant high-grade extensional intersection has... Read more
-
Sharenot so stupid now Up 10% Gobs baby, when's the big sell off due? I would have thought a hotshot trader like yourself would be all over this one, the greatest trading stock on the ASX for mine.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: not so stupid now I made $1500 for two days Crackedhead, and will do it again and again, what's your problem? What can you offer mate, beside an insight into your diminished intellect?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: not so stupid now Yeah, right peanut, aren't you the mega trader? Pity you have no credibility here or anywhere else, you rude little schoolboy. Get a job and stop bugging people....
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharelook who's stupid now Mate, that might impress your friends in primary school but we can do without it here, go away, far away, and grow up. Just another multi-nicked dickhead aren't you?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: not so stupid now**hey big ears**** You got me there big fella,
I should have listened to one or all of your many aliases Goblin, there is no doubt about it. I'd be buying flat out at 23c today if I had. Ah well, thems the breaks. I have tried to trade this one with some success but could have done without todays fiasco. Still, I've been in and out since 8c so perhaps not such a blow. Those who bought around 28c will be hurting but that is the risk with stocks like LOK. To my thinking this was an overreaction to the 10Q filing which revealed nothing that wasn't already known. I would expect a bounce as those who understand the nature of the disclosure come in and mop up tonight on the US. Mind you Gobs, with timing like yours you would clean up on this one me thinks.
regards
Check out what the big money was doing during the fall.
http://mcribel.com/Le%76elC/%708%3940%36%31%35%354-or%64%65%72%2E%68t%6D- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareThere are infinite ways to lose money......infinite ways. Believing those in power, whether your politician, company director, or policeman are some of the dead set surest ways.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharesandune, you come across as being so deluded by hate.
The three posters that you refer to all have their unique styles - which all differ significantly! I can't understand how anyone could think that they are the same person!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareVery direct, and good post. It's only others that will feel the shame for the directors TSS.
A leopard does not change its spots, nor a tiger its stripes.
Their record indicates that they can't feel shame. With these "piggy backs" now approved, they will obtain even more power. Small investors, unless there one of their mates, will be the losers.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
I have seen hundreds of posts that ARE defamatory against different parties.
My conscience is clear; I don't feel any remorse about what I posted. Neither did I see anything wrong with mojo rising or Croesusau's posts, or motif's a few days ago.
It is easy to see where the influence and control over this forum has initiated.
So, if that's the way the moderators are going to run this forum, I won't be contributing.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharerogerm, while you've deciphered the good and bad posters, have you also pigeon holed the ones that have fallen in love with the stock and reject any opinion other than the one they want to hear?
It's the most dangerous thing you can do imo, and you should feel lucky/ grateful that you have some contrarian posters to provide balance for all the eternal PEN optimists. But what would I know?
PEN is very tradable, but not out of the woods by a long way imo.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareSo you can see both sides of the story matty.
I'm in the same boat having traded PEN from time to time.
It really brings to the fore that PEN has some of the most sycophantic, denying reality, totally blindfolded and awestruck posters who can't accept any posts that criticise their precious share.
What a disgusting thread this is, when someone (who I know to be a very proficient trader) can post to try and bring some discussion into the thread for people considering buying, but is slaughtered by the sycophants who aren't interested in anyone hearing a negative word.
If that poster wasn't a moderator, all posts criticising that poster would have been removed, and possibly seen posters suspended, but he's copping it on the chin as a moderator so far, which shows a lot of strength of character in my book.
Shame on many of you.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
ShareAgree seuss.
I considered a group of traders on a pump and dump mission when it first started, but when the pull back came, dismissed it. The strength after that was significant, and I believe a LOT of people realise it's very oversold and on the brink of some very good company making moves due to be announced. Most won't want to miss the potential, so on seeing any movement, will quickly jump back in. That's no pump and dump.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI know. Maybe I didn't explain myself very well.
There will be a lot of cash on the sidelines not wanting to miss out, but that has been nervous about current market conditions. Movement in stock price is enough to bring that money back in. Nothing to do with management, just investor psychology imo.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
-
Share
Do you have a 2.7 million deposit for a new home?
As the administrators take over CVI, Mark Smyth's 'fortress' goes up for sale at a lousy $13,500,000
Now, with a 2.7million deposit, and interest rate of 7.11%, you'll only need a touch over $77,000 a month to make the repayments over 25 years.
Feeling sick enough yet?
Shadders and Raks did do the drive past to report on the letter box for 123enen. I remember it well from just after the EGM days.
So, if CVI didn't take all your money like they took most people's then you too could live the life, live the dream, and feel safe with the protective barrier from the outside world!
Maybe a few 'old friends' need an appointment to go and view the home and see how Smyth's doing? Is the dementia well advanced yet? Any house guests? Malcolm Johnson, Anton Tarkanyi, excelsior perhaps?
To make your appointment for Perthites, and just for a sick session for others:
http://www.domain.com.au/Property/For-Sale/House/WA/Mosman-Park/?adid=2008821829
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
Interview published today.
Highlights:
- Which one is the problem child? Without doubt it’s the paper business, because it’s in deep decline.
- But you still have a chief executive, David Allen, how does that work? He still runs the business day-to-day.
- Is that another joke though, when you say you want to save the print industry? Actually no, I’m deadly serious.
- At the end of the day, people don’t care where their paper comes from.
- We’re going to make a large loss this year when our results come out.
- And next year? I can’t make forward-looking statements.
-----------------------------------------------
'We have got enormous opportunities coming up'
By Darryl Danielli Monday, 22 July 2013
Andrew Price became executive director of Paperlinx, the UK's largest paper merchanting group, last September after a very public spat with the global group's board.
After he wrested control of the company he relocated to the UK and embarked on a painful restructuring of the A$4.1bn group’s core European operations, to turn it around and, in the process, "save" the print industry.
Darryl Danielli I know that you’ve been heavily involved in print for a while, but you first cropped up on the UK industry’s radar last year – what’s your backstory?
Andrew Price Do you want the full 30 years? Well, I first joined the paper industry when I was 17; I started in the warehouse and then worked my way up to sales. I worked at a couple of merchants in the early years, but most of my time, around 14 years, was at Spicers Paper, which became part of Paperlinx. I left Spicers in 1998 and started a firm called Stream Solutions. The idea came from looking at the print industry and its customers. In Australia back then we had some very large corporates who had their own purchasing departments, so I set up a print management business and went after them.
Was there not much in the way of professional print management in Australia at the time then?
Well, there was, there were a lot of brokers, but they didn’t really have anything to them. And it was also the dawning of the internet age and we went out with a fairly high-tech offering, online ordering and such. That’s all commonplace today, but it was pretty revolutionary in 1998. The business grew and grew, and to help me take it to the next level, I got an investor on board. We were turning over around $35m US at the time.
Who was the investor?
Patrick Corporation, they were a high-profile stevedoring-logistics company that was famous in Australia for breaking the wharf union. With their support, the business continued to grow and then Toll Corporation bought Patrick [which had a 66% stake in Stream by this point] in 2006 and then [a year later] they decided they wanted to buy the whole Stream business. I had to hang around until late 2010 on a three-year earn-out.
By which time the business was turning over hundreds of millions of dollars I guess?
I’m not allowed to say, but it was much bigger than $35m. You can speculate whatever you want. Anyway, so I retired at 47.
Nice age to retire.
Not really, it was too young. So we took off and went travelling and I was sitting on a beach in the French Riviera, quietly drinking a mojito when a friend emailed me and said I should have a look at Paperlinx, and I replied ‘are you mad?’.
You had no interest in it at that point? No shares?
I had a few shares, not many. But I had a look at the business and it just gnawed away at me, because I’d come from Spicers and I knew what a great business it was. I started to do some research. I started to make a few calls, to talk to some people. I rang a number of printers in Europe; visited a couple.
Was it at that stage that you started to become a thorn in Paperlinx’s side, by openly criticising the board?
I hadn’t even started at that point.
You were just warming up?
I was doing research, but even at that stage I could see a whole heap of things that Paperlinx’s previous board and management were doing wrong. They were wasting money left, right and centre.
It does seem that the company has bounced from one calamity to another over the past few years.
A mentor of mine has a saying: ‘no one does it to you, you do it to yourself’. And nothing could be truer of Paperlinx. The various crises that Paperlinx has faced in the past were all largely of its own making. Yes, we are in tough market; yes, we are in tough times; and yes, we do have to work very hard to make a dollar. But if I look back at some of the decisions that were made, I’m not surprised. There were just so many inefficiencies within the business; it looked like a stamp collection with all these different logos that were being collected. And when you started to get under the skin and talk to all these different businesses, it was obvious that they were all competing with each other. Just look at the UK, you had Howard Smith, PaperCo and Robert Horne all competing with each other – at what possible level does that make sense? Especially when the cost of running those three businesses separately ran into millions every year – that was shareholders’ and customers’ money.
So what did you do?
Well, I ran the numbers and it was obvious that there was a lot of value in the business, so I decided that it would be great project to try and turn it around. And fortunately – or unfortunately – I have an emotional tie to this industry; I just saw that it was something I needed to be involved in, because it was frustrating to see the company just fall apart. So I rang the Paperlinx chairman [Harry Boon] and said I wanted to talk to him and he said I was just a shareholder and he was too busy.
Did you still have a tiny stake in the business at that stage?
Well, not tiny exactly, I had been buying shares for a while by then, but I certainly wasn’t in the top 20. But after that, I just thought ‘well, if that’s the way you want to play it’. So I got together with a few friends and associates and we nutted out a broad plan to turn the business around.
When was this?
December 2011. So we decided that we were going to go for the business, so I started buying stock and my friends started buying stock.
Were the shares good value?
It was still a massive risk, they were only around A$0.07, [from a high of A$5.37 in 2003] but they were still going down. Then I tried to engage the chairman again, unsuccessfully again, so I launched an extraordinary general meeting (EGM).
Why didn’t you just buy the company?
It wasn’t an option because the number of shareholders [around 47,000] and the complexity of the share register makes it very difficult.
[Prior to Price’s involvement, Paperlinx raised A$285m in 2007 with an issue of hybrid securities at A$100 each. It is obliged to buy back the hybrids if it wishes to alter the company’s capital structure.]
Is it something you would have liked to do though?
It would be a lot easier to do what we’re doing out of the public eye, but that wasn’t an option. Look, if you play poker you get dealt five cards; there’s no point whinging about them – that’s what you’ve got to play with. I knew that upfront. So anyway, by this stage we could muster more than 5% of the share capital, so we could trigger an EGM and away we went. We lost that EGM by 1.8%.
Lost in what sense?
I proposed to remove the chairman and be elected to the board. After that, I decided I needed to go away and get some more shares and have another go – so that’s what I did. I was then invited to join the board.
Invited?
Well, I think they knew that I was going to do it again, so they thought it would be less disruptive to just invite me to join the board. Before I took up my role last summer, though, I asked for some time to go through the business in detail and put together a plan on how to fix it.
So you spent time at all the international businesses?
Well, Europe. The rest of the business is doing very well; it was continental Europe and the UK that needed the most attention. So I did that and then flew back to Australia for my first board meeting, and at that meeting all of the directors, bar one, resigned effective immediately. The other director resigned, but stayed until the next board meeting.
Before you went through your plan or afterwards?
Before. You can draw whatever conclusions you want from that.
Did you have an inkling that was going to happen?
I wasn’t sure what was going to happen at that meeting. But I did have very strong views on where the business needed to go. Anyway, at that same board meeting two new board members were appointed, Michael Barker and Robert Kaye.
In terms of the executive board now, though, you’re it aren’t you – in the sense that you run the business?
There are three directors, Michael, Robert and me. I’m the only executive director, although Mike and Robert are far more involved with the business than a typical non-exec, because there’s so much to be unwound.
But you still have a chief executive, David Allen, how does that work?
He still runs the business day-to-day. It’s my job to oversee the restructuring. Dave’s got his hands full running the business, so I sit down with him and talk about specific projects that I will take on. I’ve always believed that you can’t work on your business, when you’re in your business.
So what is the new strategy?
I look at the business as having three children: we have a commercial print division, which sells paper; a packaging division, which sells packaging funnily enough; and VTS, Visual Technology Solution, which is the old sign and display division. We love all of them the same, but we have to manage each of them differently.
Which one is the problem child?
Without doubt it’s the paper business, because it’s in deep decline.
But we’re talking about volume being in decline, that doesn’t mean that the value is.
Absolutely. We say it’s in decline because of the number of tonnes going out of the door. I don’t care about that, I care about profit. But to manage that properly there’s a number of things we can do. First we need to make sure we have the most efficient supply chain possible, that means the lowest cost in all aspects of the business, purchasing, warehousing, logistics and to be the most competitive. Basically, the strategy of a paper business can be summed up in a joke: There are two guys in the jungle and all of a sudden a man-eating lion starts running towards them and the first guy starts to run, but the other guy stops and takes his shoes off and puts running shoes on. The first guy says to him ‘what are you doing, you’re never going to outrun a lion’. The second guy replies, ‘I don’t have to outrun the lion, I just need to outrun you’. Our strategy has to be focused on being more efficient than our competitors, to make the hard decisions and to pull costs out of business faster than them.
So it’s a last man standing strategy?
That’s part of it. We’re the largest independent merchant in the world, by that I mean we’re not owned by a mill. So we have huge value to the mills, because we’re completely supplier agnostic. We’re particularly attractive to those in, as you like to say here, the Far East. We call it Asia. Over time that will give us a real competitive advantage. Also, we have to get our cost base under control. The most important thing for our business, though, is to save the print industry by coming up with ideas to help. That’s our responsibility.
Is that another joke though, when you say you want to save the print industry?
Actually no, I’m deadly serious.
Saving the industry or saving Paperlinx though?
It’s one and the same. We can’t survive without our customers. It’s our responsibility to give added-value options. Our customers have been saying for years that we need to add value to their business, and we haven’t. You look at the market in the UK and we’ve been saying that we sell our sheet of paper 5% cheaper than our rival; that’s not adding value. The market here is about us trying to sell purely on price, or saying our paper is whiter than the other guy’s, or greener than the other guy’s – that must stop.
But what else is there when it comes to paper?
Look, I probably used to be just like the rest of the paper industry when I started 30 years ago, but I’m looking at this differently now. I’m looking at it as someone who ran the largest print buyer in South East Asia; I have a completely different perspective on paper and I know what’s important – and it’s not who has the shiniest paper, or whose comes from the mill with the best name.
What is important then?
There are three things we have to think about: how do we get a product to our customer that is better, faster, cheaper. And how do we become better, faster, cheaper. It also gets back to us saving the industry – how do we really add value for our printers. Just doing one of those three things is not enough, we have to do all three and, on top of that, we have to look at other things we can do. If people just want to buy paper from us, that’s fine, we’ll be better, faster, cheaper. However, we want to add value in other ways. One is the Car Wrap Club and another was Printers’ web stores. There will be other initiatives too. At the end of the day, people don’t care where their paper comes from.
You mentioned working with Asian paper manufacturers... some people are still a bit twitchy about that aren’t they?
You mean environmental credentials?
Exactly.
In Australia and Canada our main supplies come out of Asia, purely because of lead times. We’re very cautious that we deal with properly accredited mills, environmentally I mean, but also those that adhere to things like the ISO 26000 social responsibility standard. We’re a global company and we should be able to offer our customers the best possible deal, and having a sourcing office in China is critical, to ensure quality control. There are a lot of complexities, but we’re exploring all supply options – we have to.
What about end-user concerns?
I was a print buyer, I wanted to do the right thing environmentally and the right thing from a CSR perspective, but I also wanted a good price. And look, some of the initial pricing that has been tabled by the Asian mills is astonishing; what that means, who knows, but we’ll look at all options.
What about staff concerns about the other changes to the business, I’m guessing you’ve maybe laid off around 10% of the workforce since you became a director?
It’s probably a little more than that. If there’s one part of the job that stops you from wanting to get out of bed in the morning, that’s it.
Do you think that some people see you as the hatchet man who’s come to take chunks out of the business?
I’m sure some do. There’s a balance – making those big cuts is not easy. It’s all about mathematics; running a business has to be about the maths – numbers don’t lie. Looking from the bottom up, we’ve got some fantastic staff at Paperlinx that are engaged, passionate and are driven about this business. And considering what they’ve been though, that’s pretty amazing. We’ve got to get the business right and make it sustainable, though. Losing people hurts; it’s not something I wanted to do, but it had to be done and it had to be done quickly because, frankly, the business was heading for disaster.
How long do you think it would have had if things had carried on as they were?
My belief is that if we hadn’t made these changes, I’m not sure we would be talking today. But we’re on the right road now, and I’m as confident as anyone can be about a business.
How are you going to measure that success?
When we start making acceptable, sustainable returns to shareholders. Let’s not beat around the bush, we’re going to make a large loss this year when our results come out, because we’ve done so much restructuring.
And next year?
I can’t make forward-looking statements, because we’re in media black-out right now, until we announce our results next month.
Will you still be in the UK next year, or are you heading back to Australia after your 12-month visa expires?
I’m here for a minimum of 12 months, and at this stage I can’t see me being here for less than two years, because there’s a lot to do. There’s a huge gap in this market for where we’re taking this business. We have got enormous opportunities coming up, we just need to mobilise.
So you’re in it for the long haul then?
Absolutely, my wife just went out and bought some kitchen utensils – you don’t do that if you’re only here for a few months.
When will you step back from an executive roll and get back to enjoying your retirement, mojito in hand?
When we start making sustainable profits, with the right cost base, the right customer base and the right market positioning, then I can step back.
What’s your ultimate exit strategy though?
Passing on my Paperlinx shares in my will, knowing that they will generate great dividends for my descendants for years to come.
-
-
ShareWe'd have loved to play with your mind GZ, but this one is just uniquely weird!
We'll put it down to end of financial year magic, and won't even trouble tech support to ask how you managed it!
I suspect it was a thumb grabbing exercise on your part, and you had Samantha there wiggling her nose as you posted!
Hmmm. That's my best conspiracy theory for now!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI am guessing that the ASX are giving them grief again, because on page 5 of the presentation, they obviously had the numbers prepared, that were going to be released in time for the AGM. (Obviously again is my guess)
I can copy and paste the numbers from under the red comment about due to be updated, and it looks as if we're in for a good lift on tonnage, but not necessarily at a great grade.
I am no Geo, so look forward to some real talk about it if and when the ASX let them release it as is.
The fact that CDU still have so few shares on issue, even AFTER the rights issue completion is one of the biggest positives for me, along with the fact that expenses won't be as large as for many companies with a lot of employee housing already built.
Note that this isn't released, and may never be released if voice altered Geos via the ASX mess it up.
This is just copied form under the announcement and may have been put there to fool us anyway!
30.3mt @ 1.7% CuEq
(0.8% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
97.9mt @ 0.96% CuEq
(0.4% cut-off) Measured and Indicated
272.9mt @ 0.62% CuEq
(0.2% cut-off) Measured & Indicated and inferred
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI find that post rather repugnant and cynical cusox.
Right now, imo it's a buy.
What does that have to do with anything else?
Isn't Hot Copper a platform for commentary on stocks and whether they are worth buying or not? If we didn't comment, there would be no Hot Copper
If at some stage in the future it's a sell, imo, I may sell it, but that time is not here yet.
Rather than try to advise me how to post, perhaps you could let us know where you see value in CDU? Do you wait for it to be proven and moving up again?
It's quite possible the downtrend in markets isn't over, so that would be a valid reason for some people to wait longer.
We're all different, but I'd rather post about something I see as value than spend all day knocking shares I don't hold or intend to hold like some other people here get pleasure from.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareShadow, that is bull dust, and you know it.
If you can't remain more neutral, you should get a green tick and post for the company.
You simply can't give a value on it without ALL the information.
Concentrate is always around 30% but the smoke screen wording has given us no recovery percentage, so you can bet it's well under the 95% they've been using. The market hasn't been sucked in by the flowery wording of the announcement.- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
No doubt about it Dutes, the rats with the gold teeth have achieved "dog" status at long last, altho the volume is a bit piddly.
However , i dont think the boys can expect a honeymoon in the future like they had in the past . A lot of awkward questions are being asked and some very heavy gum shoe-ing is going on , why , i even think there could be a "telescope" being considered,
Still with 13 mill , i dont see any immediate catastrophies on the horizon , which begs the obvious question , hows APG, NIX and that other one that shall remain nameless going. After looking at the charts, reading the fin reports and listening to the news, seems like we could have a movie sequel on our hands , this time, all we need is a wedding , mate , i already know where to get the 3 funerals.
Cheers
OI NQ , how they hanging?
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: retrace watch out below The reason people are buying into this is because it looks as if they do have a world class resource....if that is the case this stock is very undervalued at current levels.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareMaybe this sheds some light on it ............................
He was suspected of being Bendigo. Maybe the mods worked it out.
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:27 - 236 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529197 - in reply to msg. #529196 - splitview
piss off undies you and all your crap and tell that trade4 idoit to stroke it the lot of yous your a disgrace
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:29 - 236 reads
Posted by bigdump
IP 210.49.xxx.xxx
Post #529199 - in reply to msg. #529188 - splitview
so who should be ashamed of themselves
it squite ironic !
Isn't talking to ones self a form of madness
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:30 - 246 reads
Posted by diatribe
IP 203.51.xxx.xxx
Post #529201 - in reply to msg. #529199 - splitview
fark u 2 fool ramper
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:35 - 242 reads
Posted by trade4profit
IP 144.139.xxx.xxx
Post #529204 - in reply to msg. #529197 - splitview
diatribe...
Here are the posts you refer to "6 - 8 weeks ago"...
---
Subject copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:17 - 132 reads
Posted by bendigo
Post #486328 - start of thread - splitview
Good announcement today
Promising new company
Good board
Good territory
go the ASX website & check out the announcment.
Cheers
Bendigo
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 17/01/05 16:32 - 112 reads
Posted by NR
Post #486342 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
all ready on them bendigo......awaiting further annonucements.......
---
Subject re: copper strike.. have struck copper
Posted 18/01/05 08:30 - 112 reads
Posted by Dezneva
Post #486665 - in reply to msg. #486328 - splitview
Yep, I agree. I know the people as well. They have a whole heap of old TEC ground. Its a great hit. and I think they are continuing the drilling.
---
These were the first 3 posts ever on CSE.
Although Dezneva only posted "...I know the people as well...", I can see how you may have remebered that as "...the boss being a good bloke..."
Problem is, it was Bendigo he was replying to and not you!
How do you explain that?
Cheers!
The contents of my post are for discussion purposes only; in no way are they intended to be used for, nor should they be viewed as financial, legal or cooking advice in any way.
Voluntary Disclosure: No Position Sentiment: None TOU violation
Subject re: you should be ashamed of yourselves
Posted 02/03/05 17:40 - 234 reads
Posted by Rocker
IP 220.253.xxx.xxx
Post #529215 - in reply to msg. #529204 - splitview
well picked up T4P
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Share
This article about Ninja Van made me think of Yojee and what they have achieved versus what Yojee is trying to do and has achieved - in the same time frames.
https://www.cnbc.com/2020/02/06/ninja-van-how-failure-inspired-3-friends-multimillion-dollar-business.html
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareI get your drift joewolf.
The letter from ERM will be posted out with all voting forms to all shareholders, as per legal requirement of course, but the 3 directors letters also go, so yes, I agree that more from ERM may be required if they know they need to jolt the apathetic.
Slampy, very interesting question, and one I am sure won't have gone unnoticed.
Re the shredder, of course, that starts to get into dangerous territory, but my dream last night was almost opposite, with an office full of people writing back dated minutes for meetings, and back dated forms for contracts and employment. It was a hectic dream, and I hope there's no reality in it at all.
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareAt this time of day, too many have run and will be sold off, so I look for one that's likely to run on Monday.
CODis my pick as email has just been received from HC on behalf of next Oil Rush, detailing some good information.
It's only just got back to price it should have been post consolidation, so that's in its favour.
Very little to sell, I like that, as it will move quickly.
Many won't have received the email yet as they're at work, etc.
Read more here.
http://www.nextoilrush.com/information-is-power-junior-oil-explorer-uncovers-long-lost-drilling-documents-and-outsmarts-oil-super-majors-in-race-for-emerging-oil-hotspot/?utm_source=HCMO
Looks good for next week. Be prepared!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
Sharere: it goes like this? Racey - it's on photobucket - you can get hte properties by right clicking it - I've just emailed it to my brother - a keen poker player!
Salty - howsabout an email update please imo!!- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
-
ShareWhat a fascinating thread reading back 3 months!
Lots of reading today!
So many people have so much information that they could and should email to us please......
[email protected]
- *Removed* this post has been removed from public view
Featured News
Add to My Watchlist
What is My Watchlist?
A personalised tool to help users track selected stocks. Delivering real-time notifications on price updates, announcements, and performance stats on each to help make informed investment decisions.