If you bought right it really doesn't matter. Property will become less attractive to the masses because the lure of capital gain or increased borrowing capacity dulls when its 2%-6% per year rather than the 20-40% experienced circa 02/03.
I would defy anyone on this board or any analyst to find a residential property in Australia's population centres that has ever sold on the open market (excludes all family transfers) 10 years later for less than 20% capital growth. In reality we all know its probably substantially more.
Long term there is nothing safer than residential property, except possibly Govt. Bonds/Gold
Long term residential property growth is like a punt on the gigis with the odds stacked in your favour.
You can almost set your calender by RE growth cycles.
- Forums
- General
- the economist and the housing bubble
the economist and the housing bubble, page-5
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 79 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
NEWS
Week 31 Wrap: JORC rules to get tougher; RBA rate hike chance 50/50; US Fed Sept cut still the quo
BOE
Uranium prices on the NYMEX are stable, but ASX uranium stocks are sinking on Friday. The answer lies in Kazakhstan