You insist on conducting your argument which is not the same as mine. I am saying the Florida election was rigged and the next election in 2004 will also be rigged by the disenfranchisement of likely Democrat voters.
It is not relevant to say that Democrats may use similar tactics. It is not relevant to say Clinton lied about his misdemeanours. It is not relevant to say a Democrat appointed judge of the Florida Supreme Court supported Harris' decision to disallow votes. It is not relevant that Jeb Bush had a clear majority. Your numbers are irrelevant.
What is relevant is that the election was rigged by foul means and without that rigging Bush would not be president, the US might be economically more heathy, 911 may not have happened and certainly, the US would not be sinking into nazi-style attempts at world domination by military force.
You claimed at first Harris was a Democrat when she was completely committed to the Bush campaign (how could she be - Secretary of State is part of the Jeb Bush administration. You are right about one thing - you and I will never agree because you are a blinkered apologist for the Republicans.
