bacci my point is quite simple if you read the article
it quire clearly states that any action taken is "not about regime change' further articles have stated again quite clearly, that no troops will set foot in Syria,personally thats a view that i hold as it would be far too dangerous and wouldnt be supported by any of the populations involved
any action taken would be purely punitive and of a surgical strike nature to ensure they didnt try it again
your emotive posts suggest something different so without appearing rude, tell us what you KNOW to be so different from that as advised by the western govennents involved ?
please give us facts,not history,nor tugging of heart strings or anti west propaganda
