Bowral, how enlightening you are to yourself. Your interpretation of you evaluating my posts are somewhat true to an extent. Obviously, when I do cut and paste, I do decide to agree and understand where my argument is leading to ( don't presume that I am that dumb ) my cut and paste is evidence of reference based on the study and understanding of a history which may be exact or not depending on which side you are from and also depending on the historians view which may have fragmented attachments of a possible reality. It's quite simple and yet you continue to label me with a cause that amuses yourself not me.
Let me also point out that I don't really know what you think and believe and if I think I know it would be the result of assuming, since the only way to direct an assumption would be from what you say. So that's quite elementary.
For the rest its your opinion and I sincerely do believe you are in confusion, especially when contradictions appear.
