buyers building, page-94

Forgot to finish this:

'So unless you qualify and get conditionals in writing (as ESI did with MONASH) then you are always pushing poo uphill wth a fork and you will always have a million "leads"to do potential business with'

So by making things conditional it takes you from having nothing but sutff-around to having something for your trouble.
Soooo...why haven't we taken Monash on for breaching the conditions of our agreement together?

It was done to protect us.
But it is not being actionaed. Hence, it becomes [plausible (id didn't say honest) to say that 'we are still in negotiations with monash and have no reason to action a breach with them for it jeopardises the deal, which happens to be progressing as announced'.

You see how companies (not ESI or MONASH) can do this "Due-diligence-mating-dance" where they just keep the months and years rolling on...and salaries flowing... while they find excuses to stretch out results but continually feed hopes to shareholders?

Due diligence - pfft. REAL cut throt business making includes regularly closing the deals.
If not, tie them up with conditions until you can satisfy them and then close the deal.
Obstacles? Remove them, then close the deal.
If they breach an agreement that is conditional and enforceable - enforce it...do something about it to show integrity of word and instill confidence in your creditors/shareholders (unless you're suing one of them :-))

L