"In ignorance, and frustration that this brings, resorting to bullying and ridiculing the messenger, trying to justify data that has no relevance, is plainly wrong or just made up."
....................................
You obviously weren't around here a few years ago when the boot was on the other foot. Bullying and ridicule were in no short supply back then.Harden up....
....................................
"The pity is that these threads are too readily populated by writers of similar ilk all patting each other on the back (when they are able to lift their knuckles from the floor), so typical of the so called sceptic."
....................................
Really? Says more about you than anyone else...
....................................
"I often wonder whether these individuals genuinely hold the views they profess, or are in the pay of some misguided institution bent of wrenting havoc on humanity for some financial gain."
....................................
Any evidence for that? Or is that just a green fantasy? As sceptics are outspent by a factor 1000+ I'd say the money was behind the warmist story.
.....................................
"In the end though they just end up talking themselves and each other, a small band of tortured tools (sic), irrelevant and mis-guided, as the rest of the world moves on..."
......................................
Well the rest of the world is moving on, carbon trading in terminal decline, Kyoto cactus, carbon tax kaput, cracks emerging everywhere in the story, IPCC looking like idiots(even more so), even James Lovelock, one of the founders of the story has recanted... So which group exactly are you describing, the warmists or the sceptics?
