boat people no longer "clients", page-2

  1. 25,913 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1

    I don't understand this burning desire for some to try and demonize Asylum Seekers.

    It is sad if hate is the only way some people think they can drum up support against the boat arrivals.

    Surely people can support being tough on Asylum Seekers without the need to demonize them and promote hate and bigotry.


    ‘irregular maritime arrivals’


    "..."Illegal" entrants?

    Asylum seekers who arrive in Australia by boat are not acting illegally. The UN Refugee Convention (to which Australia is a signatory) recognises that refugees have a lawful right to enter a country for the purposes of seeking asylum, regardless of how they arrive or whether they hold valid travel or identity documents. The Convention stipulates that what would usually be considered as illegal actions (e.g. entering a country without a visa) should not be treated as illegal if a person is seeking asylum.

    In line with our obligations under the Convention, Australian law also permits unauthorised entry into Australia for the purposes of seeking asylum. Asylum seekers do not break any Australian laws simply by arriving on boats or without authorisation. This means that it is incorrect to refer to asylum seekers who arrive without authorisation as “illegal” entrants, as they in fact have a lawful right to enter Australia to seek asylum.

    Permitting asylum seekers to entry a country without travel documents is similar to allowing ambulance drivers to exceed the speed limit in an emergency – the action would be ordinarily be considered illegal, but the under the circumstances it's reasonable to make an exception...."


    http://www.refugeecouncil.org.au/f/as-boat.php


 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.