boat people no longer "clients", page-17

  1. 25,905 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1

    "...Glug - if an Aussie defrauds centrelink would you say we are being heartless to prosecute them?...Zonetrader"

    Zonetrader, if they are not genuine, simply send them back, no need to demonize them.


    "...Hasn't it occurred to you yet that the vast majority of "asylum seekers" are in reality fraudsters simply trying to dupe the convention, & wet behind the ears people such as yourself?...ausheds"

    ausheds, the ones that are not genuine, send back. No need to demonize the genuine Asylum Seekers just because you feel "some" are not genuine.



    So what points do you guys disagree with.



    1/ Non genuine Asylum Seekers should be sent back.

    I say they should be sent back, do you disagree?



    2/ Asylum Seekers do not need to be demonized to be tough on boat arrivals.

    I don't believe Asylum Seeker need to be demonized to implement a tough stance on Asylum Seekers.

    Do you believe Asylum Seekers should be demonized?



    3/ We should take genuine Asylum Seeker and deter non genuine Asylum seekers.

    Do you disagree?



    Just trying to clarify the above as you guys seem to be arguing points I have already supported in my posts.


 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.