"To rely on a clause which, in effect, provides a hypothetical proposition that the responsible entity holds the property absolutely and the beneficial interest to that property, we say, does not speak to and cannot speak to the relationship between a trustee and its beneficiary."
would that make it a 'illusory trust'? ie not acting as a trust?.....recent NZ case.
Mr Halley has my vote.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- OCV
- wcl v asic and pn
OCV
octaviar limited
wcl v asic and pn, page-3
-
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 2 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)