the trend is your friend , page-66

http://www.nytimes.com/2008/10/07/business/media/07adco.html?_r=0

http://tobacco.stanford.edu/tobacco_main/images.php?token2=fm_st001.php&token1=fm_img0002.php&theme_file=fm_mt001.php&theme_name=Doctors%20Smoking&subtheme_name=More%20Doctors%20Smoke%20Camels

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1470496/

I'm not sifting thru to find the data they used but they had plenty from reputable sources...

This was an easier subject to emphasise a point... As hard as It would of been to find data on the other side back then - it is now for our discussion.

Crazy huh!? Back then it was doctors and company shills- today it's politicians and company shills..

How about u find me peer reviewed data that shows 100% of Americas fracking adventures were successful without incident of contamination ...I'll save U the trouble- u won't- the " peer reviewed" part will prove to difficult.

Maybe u should apply some of that "critical analysis" I so lack because I think u have ur blinkers on..
To use any kind of proper scientific analysis it is dishonest to say with 100% that everything/ anything comes up rosey...what pr firm do u work for?

I present another side, which by the sounds of it, u completely dismiss. By Working In absolutes like that u erode the quality of everything else u have to say...

And at the end of it all this isn't directly related to BUL? Its about a factually dishonest statement in an otherwise informative news story, which for me- erodes whatever else is said in it.. A bit like u...stop getting so defensive..


Imo...DYOR...ignore spelling mistakes ext it's 4:30am..