into the 20's

...no surprises here

anyone else think that it would be nice if lyc management updated all retail investors more often then they are?
for example, are the issues fixed?
if not - what is the expected time-frame?
are they ahead of schedule or behind?
have the potential customers with the samples, fallen asleep?
are staff at the lamp becoming tiddlywinks champions?
etc...

anyone else think that but not releasing updated more frequently that it slightly convenient for the shorting instos?

anyone else think that this could easily go to 25c, perhaps after a lame DCB (note the amount of buy orders sitting there - real or bogus, or, using comparatively lateral thought, both)

why bother holding a stock that could easily be controlled by shorting insto's? and just as easily, quite possibly, shorted (or churned-down) to 10c?

i can recall a couple of recent posts where folks have taken or added to a long position on the basis of traditional fundamentals, without considering the more relevant fundamentals of the twisted golden rule - he who has the gold, makes the rules.

potentially a tough lesson
i did my dough on this, i have to say - possible, facade.
other's are still getting nailed
although they may, in-part, deserve what they get, i don't think it is 100% warranted, since they are not the only factor in the equation, so i do have some sympathy.
is it virtuous to take advantage of naivety and trust?