demise of manufacturing capability, page-4

  1. 37,911 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 828
    to add, the writer's understanding is also flawed due to an improper social perspective

    the writer appears to not see that those nations competitive in manufacturing are basically exploiting slave labour with 18th century Industrial Revolution conditions

    Chinese, Indonesian, etc, workers being paid $1 per day which is what makes these nations competitive

    the writer has, whether consciously or subconsciously, a "Gina Reinhardt" mentality

    the writer is, by default, accepting it is perfecting OK to exploit labour as is done in Asia, where people live in slums

    the reality is company & management income has increased massively over the last 30 years where as worker wages have remained stagnant (per CPI)

    our problem is we are willing, as a society, to purchase goods manufactured in nations with 18th century Industrial Revolution like work conditions

    our problem is we expect to pay little for luxury goods, like TVs, which should last for many years

    a TV is a luxury good and its cost should be commensurate to a luxury good

    regards


 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.