religious contradictions, page-78

Igilug,

There's no need to repost stuff that you've already posted in this thread. I have read your claims previously and you have consistently refused to answer my questions regarding those claims. I am not the one who is confused about objective truth and you have completely failed to show how the Bible does not contain objective truths and is full of contradictions.

In fact maybe failed is the wrong term as you haven't even made any effort to demonstrate your claims whatsoever.

"Director if you can not abide by this simple rule, there is no point in debating as our conversation would be like I as knower of fire try to explain what a fire means to you as an eskimo. or a knower of fire explained to an eskimo."

What are talking about?

Making an arbitrary claim about what constitutes objective truth is fine. I can play that game. And by saying that I 'cannot abide by YOUR arbitrary rules' is just sill as you haven't applied those same rules to ANY of your claims (as I keep complaining about).

So again, please put up or shut up, answer my questions at the start of the thread and you might start to make your case, reposting your terms and conditions over and over and/or moving the goalposts is not accomplishing anything.

Here they are reposted for your convenience.

'OK so to prove your TRUTH claim how about you post one contradiction and we'll go from there?'

'So it seems that your premise is " God created Adam and Eve can not be taken seriously as it is not objective ".

So you've stated your premise, but not your argument.

Please follow up with your argument so that we can continue.'

Please provide some evidence or argument that '"Nothing in the Bible is objective"

""Adam and Eve or Noah and his ark is all invented and by no way objective. And contradicts the very essence of logic.

Please explain to us how those two things "contradict the very essence of logic"?



"