Ann: Gravity Gold Recoveries of 94% Achieved at C, page-10

re: Ann: Gravity Gold Recoveries of 94% Achie... Innocentcarbon, From memory the sample was taken from an area of approximately 2 meters by 2.5 meters giving us a face area of 5 square meters and the mining decline will be 4 meters by 4.5 meters giving us 18 square meter face so that is 3.6 times larger area then the area the sample was taken from. If the rock in the extended are is baron and contains no gold at all then we need to divided the grade by 3.6 to give us a mining grade. So my thinking is, all be it pessimistically, that if the grade for this sample comes back at 10 g/t then after I factor in the baron rock from the mining decline it comes down to 2.8 g/t. Of course the surrounding rock my have the same grade as the sample rock but that has yet to be proven and with the fact that the previous mining activities did not mine this area then I very much doubt there will be much gold in it... Time will tell and yes , even 2.8 g/t from this low cost mine would still be very profitable and a great result, I am just trying to get a understanding of how to understand the results when they are released.

GLTAH