we got it.paducah, page-15

Dear Sleeveofwizard,

Your post as to the company describing the potential that the recent news creates and how it is unsatisfactory in your eyes doesn't resonate with me.

You use the term "down beat" and state "Im (sic) no fan of ramping the share price...". Further when the company gives a timeframe as to commercialisation you cynically comment on that too.

I cannot reconcile your expectation as to the company being positive versus the tension of ramping by the company. Clearly, everyone reading the announcement understands that this news is necessary to advance the commercialisation of the technology. The news speaks only of continuing that commercialisation journey, it does not invite conclusions as to certainty which is what your criticism seeks to touch upon.

This is a long game regarding the uranium technology, if you think or expect otherwise then you may wish to reconsider your continuing holding of your shares. If you wish to be so negative about the neutral announcement of the news that is a matter for you. However, your criticism of the company is misplaced and unwarranted. The company can do no more than keep the market neutrally informed in circumstances where certainty is far from actuality.

I am intrigued in light of your criticism how your version of today's announcement would read.

GLTA