experts opinions on the lynas rare earth, page-4

http://aliran.com/15658.html

'radiation thickness'
thick
thicker
thickest

Tan Bun Teet from SMSL concluded, “Our government kept claiming that the Lynas plant is scientifically safe. This is why we have sought scientific input from credible and independent scientists and professionals who can provide us with their opinion and views without prejudice, fear or favour."

$$$$$$$..u...r...e...Tan, $$$$$...u...r...e..employed expert witnesses NEVER reflect the bias of their paymasters.

BTW Those "same" deep pockets funded all this - AND the ARPANSA guy?

..our own OZ agency ..is he there getting PAID? or otherwise compensated by the DAP+US 'democracy' slush funds to keep the pressure on LYC?? I hope he's not there on the back of us Australian Taxpayers - that would be the pits. If he was a gun for hire - selling his 'scientific services' - employed to critici$e an Australian company, then how much he wa$ paid?? This $hould be tran$parent and obtainable. I'd like to know what Bull Schmidt fee was too. Fighting these guys does in fact come out of LYC Shareholders pocket after all.

-------------------------------
this is from there website:

http://www.arpansa.gov.au/AboutUs/Corporate/ar1213/1213agency.cfm

Funding basis:

ARPANSA is funded through appropriations received directly as part of the Federal Budget.

ARPANSA's own sourced income derives from: the sale of scientific services such as the Personal Radiation Monitoring Service; Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty Organization contracts to build, operate and maintain monitoring stations; and licence application fees and annual charges associated with ARPANSA's regulatory activities.