ann out, page-41

Hi Antman,

They were still running logs as per Rep-6, so a bit early to say abt the GWC or water saturation in the Plover.

Not surprised at the cored interval which is 57m (not 60).

That 57m of cored section from 3226-3283m corresponds to the 'iffy' interval that MEO weren't clear at BW#1.

At BW1 the resistivity logs indicated a change at 3260m (TD was 3286m) which was indicative of a water cut fluid in the Sandstone.

Once they run the WL logs the 'payzones' r easy to work out, its the subtle changes in Res that need to b checked to say whether they r still in a gross gas column &/or into the GWC.

So, it will come down to the connectivity of the Plover sands betwn the 2 wells which are apprx 8kms apart.

As a first pass, if the logs confirm a good sand (with HC shows & porosity) in the cored interval, then that's surely worth a test.

Hopefully all will b revealed in their nxt update.

cheers