latest wireline analysis results, page-14

I'm not following this line of conversation at all. i.e:
1. There are no salt diapirs
2. The YG-SH basin is characterised by mud-shale diapirs
3. Cua Lo sits directly above a diapir
4. DF11 fields are at shallower depths, i.e vertically non-analogous to Cua Lo-1 payzones
5. Cua Lo-1 payzones are mainly lower Pliocene, with some upper miocene shows, where as DF11 are upper Pliocene - arguably Pleistocene.
6. The logs, side by side are not telling me much (non analogous depth).