no surprise here..i remain quite bullish, page-13

Precisely Jay18; you'd do well to hold onto that thought.

Right now the SP anticipates the risks associated, hence the lack of movement upward.

You'd do well to balance what the cheerleading squad here tell you with your own research. A consistently optimistic and biased view has been presented here for quite some time now as if it were fact only - I'd advocate caution; keep you wits about you!

Ablation technology has been shown to work at laboratory scale, no question.

However, it appears as though legal implications prevent them testing the units within the USA in a way which could verify the rated capacity; this is in my view why the announcements relating are so vague about the tech details. We're told "all is good", but are never shown why it's so good.

You need a source material license or the equivalent accreditation in the so-called Agreement States to produce 15lbs of source material per run, and a max of 150lbs per annum, yet they're supposedly "testing" 5 Metric ton per hour semi-commercial units.......make of that what you will.

No doubt you will have already read some of the exchange (phishpheet and I are the badies)

My vote is Hansen-Taylor never gets mined; too many issues relating to water contamination for UBHM, and it falls over economically via any other extraction methods (too deep).
So investing in BLR is a big bet, "all on black", that Ablation works at commercial scale. If not, your investment will vaporise overnight.