"Anybody wishing to read about Robert Gentry can find out about him in The Encyclopaedia of American Loons."
Well that sounds objective and scientific.
"If we could have a real professor or somebody with a doctorate, or without preconceived fundamentalist notions.."
lols, and we could all have magical unicorns that poop gold bars as well. :)
There's no such thing as a scientist without without preconceived fundamentalist notions (and I know a few of them), it's just the nature of the notions that varies.
So I looked up your guy anyway.
"Gentry states that his critics are not able to supply actual scientific evidence to combat his work. This causes Gentry to conclude that there is no real scientific evidence against Polonium Halos proving creation by fiat, so his critics resort to character assassination and insults [citation needed] (LOLS he called you out pretty quick :) ). This was his reason for issuing a challenge to any scientist to prove that Precambrian basement rocks could be formed, with Polonium 218 halos within them, from the elements that comprised it. In his book, he details this statement:
"The experiment being proposed is quite straight forward. The basic chemical elements of a granite, which are well-known, are to be melted, and then allowed to cool to form a synthetic rock. If my colleagues do this experiment so the synthetic rock reproduces the mineral composition and crystal structure of granite, then they will have duplicated or synthesized a piece of granite. By doing this they would have confirmed a major prediction of the evolutionary scenario – they would have demonstrated that granites can form from a liquid melt in accord with known physical laws. I will accept such results as falsifying my view that the Precambrian granites are the primordial Genesis rocks of our planet. Furthermore, if they were successful in producing a single 218Po halo in that piece of synthesized granite, I would accept that as falsifying my view that the polonium halos in granites are God's fingerprints."[8]
