Thanks YChromozome, a real TU post.
NG should go for the long term benefit of the nation, Soo's analysis says it all.
http://www.macrobusiness.com.au/2013/02/busting-negative-gearings-myths/
Further: It encourages over-investment in residential property, an essentially "unproductive" asset, which is an economic distortion.
I recall, ever so proudly, the days when Australia was a productive nation, heck, we used to produce tractors in Melbourne.
The next thing that should go is annual leave loading, no wonder Australia's competitors are laughing.
- Forums
- Property
- overwhelming support to axe negative gearing
overwhelming support to axe negative gearing, page-113
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
CC9
CHARIOT CORPORATION LTD
Shanthar Pathmanathan, MD
Shanthar Pathmanathan
MD
Previous Video
Next Video
SPONSORED BY The Market Online