climate and vaccine deniers are the same, page-41

  1. 10,759 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 8
    "Scientifically there is no debate about immunisation, with every relevant health authority strongly endorsing vaccination."

    Really? Is that comment referring to the so-called science bought and paid for by the pharmaceutical industry or health authorities who have been exposed as lying for their mistaken belief in the 'Greater Good'?

    An investigative report compiled by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D., uncovers more than 30 years of hidden government documents exposing vaccine schedules as a complete hoax, not to mention the fraud of the vaccines themselves to provide any real protection against disease.

    The JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization) made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for 'herd immunity,' a concept which does not rest on solid scientific evidence," explains Dr. Tomljenovic in the introduction to her paper.

    The information Dr. Tomljenovic gathered speaks for itself. Not only did the JCVI routinely ignore questions of safety as they came up with regards to the ever-expanding vaccination schedule, but the group actively censored unfavorable data that shed a "negative" light on vaccines in order to maintain the illusion that vaccines are safe and effective. Beyond this, the JCVI regularly lied to both the public and government authorities about vaccine safety in order to ensure that people continued to vaccinate their kids.

    The JCVI's official policy was to cherry-pick unreliable studies to support its own opinions on vaccines rather than rely on independent, scientifically-sound studies to make vaccine policy recommendations.

    The eye-opening, 45-page paper goes on to explain how vaccine schedules were established through the calculated downplaying of vaccine safety concerns and the over-inflating of vaccine benefits; the promotion of dangerous new vaccines into the pediatric schedule through deception; the discouraging of vaccine safety follow-up studies; and the widespread brainwashing of the public through manipulation and scientific sleight-of-hand tricks.

    Deliberately concealing information from parents for the sole purpose of getting them to comply with an “official” vaccination schedule should be considered as a form of ethical violation or misconduct.

    Official documents obtained from the UK Department of Health (DH) and the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunisation (JCVI) reveal that the British health
    authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program;

    Read the complete eye-opening paper here;

    http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf



 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.