Ann: Exporation Recommences at Symons Hill , page-35

Hi Onceover,

You have seriously been stating your opinion over the last few days/ weeks. You last stated:

I am sorry but 'Nearology' is a furfy. Look at DeGrussa: it's a one off. Look at Tropicana: a one off. Look at Broken Hill: a one off. Major orebodies are rare and special things. 'Nearology' is a promoter's myth , not a geological concept.

Please explain where these geological 'concepts' are, in your opinion?

You seem to be having a go at MAT. They are, after all sticking holes in the ground - just like MC did - just like they should. But it seems they haven't got a geological 'concept'.

For me, MAT have done groundwork, GEM and are doing some more, whilst doing some AC and RAB all in the hope of finding a 'one off' as you, yourself put it?

You have consistently pointed to ENT as being better? Aren't they looking for a one off as well? Or does your geographical knowledge have a better 'concept'?

Disclaimer - Holding a small position in both - many of the FR hopefulls will go up, up, up, up, up, up and up if just one finds something in FR. That's the nearology play... As long as you didn't buy at the top!