what about if you use a 16 or 18 year timeframe? doesn't the statistically significant warming in that data "kill" your 17 year theory?
You can whack that mole here until you are blue in the face. You will have more success telling a goldfish.
- Forums
- Science & Medicine
- real scince at woek
real scince at woek, page-11
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 1 more message in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)