very quiet, page-8

For example, you know the time was 30 days and the price rise was 200 points. The vector is 202.237.

Look under "New Strategies" in my 2006 forecast, the part where I explain about the 1929 crash etc is the classic use of vectors.

The vector running up to the 1929 crash was 838; the crash down to 1929 was 375 which was classic root 5 decomposition in growth. 875/SQR5 = 375. As I showed it predicted the bottom of the great depression exactly and overshoots the bottom by 0.24 or something.

The vector running from 1966 to 1982 was 891. 891 X SQRT 5 = 1992. 1987 crash was on a vector of 1994 so it over shot by 10 points or something trivial.

From 1987 to 1994 we actually saw growth decompose all though the market went up. You see in 1994 clearly where the decomposition was complete and a new side of the square was shown to the market.

As I said read the new strategy part in my 2006 report and remember the above calculations (that I did not put in the report) and you will clearly see how it comes together.

Also when Gann did his angles….. Take for example you know the total of the next vector will be say 1000. If the market moves up for 707.1 hours with a price increase of 707.10 you have the maximum move possible….. 45 degree angle. Alternatively if the price increases by 800 points it WILL happen in 600 days, but its still the same vector as above.

This is why small mining companies can have massive, massive moves up in a very short period of time…… but yet the size of this vector is the same size as the move it took the same mining company 30 years to complete in the past and gone up 100% etc.