bike rider doored by taxi, page-289

  1. 4,423 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 120
    The Australian reported the lane was marked with a bicycle symbol on the road surface
    however
    it was not a "dedicated" bike lane.....

    The Age reports:

    Nevertheless, cyclists [in Victoria] have the right to overtake vehicles on the inside, unless the vehicle is in the act of turning left.
    ...

    State bicycle operations co-ordinator Sergeant Arty Lavos said white lines and bike symbols painted on the road were lulling cyclists into a "false sense of security".
    He said lanes with bicycle symbols painted on them were not necessarily bicycle lanes, pointing to a "classic example" in front of the Victoria Police Centre in Flinders Street.
    "That's a painted bicycle symbol in that lane there, but it is not a bike lane because it has no signage," Sergeant Lavos said.



    Read more: http://www.theage.com.au/victoria/cyclistdooring-man-not-proud-of-reaction-20140319-352r5.html#ixzz2wnFVUM2Z

    important point to reiterate- cyclists can overtake vehicles on the left:

    Sergeant Lavos said:

    "Was Collins Street a designated bike lane where the cyclist was riding a bike lane? No, it isn't, but the cyclist is quite entitled to be in that left lane. Motorcyclists technically can't, because they are motor vehicles – that's overtaking on the left... bicycles excepted. The only time bicycles can't go up a lefthand side of a motor vehicle is when the vehicle is indicating and in the process of turning," explained Lavos.

    http://www.carscoops.com/2014/03/aussie-cyclist-vs-taxi-passenger-who-on.html

    so, for all the armchair lawyers out there- the cyclist was in the right, the taxi passenger was in the wrong. No brainer!
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.