9/11 explosive evidence, page-335

I wonder how many proposing various Conspiracies have read the NIST (National Institure of Standards & Technology) reports on WTC7:

http://www.nist.gov/public_affairs/factsheet/wtc_qa_082108.cfm

http://www.nist.gov/el/disasterstudies/wtc/wtc_recommendations.cfm

Suggest you spend the time reading this before proposing anymore theories.

Also, note the recommendations for improved building standards since this accident. If these buildings could not have come down the way they did, why the changes in standards? And BTW, this is not a game - this is all fact.

One other comment - John Risk mentioned that there are many different theories. One would think that by now, there would be one definitive theory with a disaster of such magnitude. Multiple theories (going round and round in circles) still more than a decade later pretty much sums up where these Conspiracy Theories belong...