shaken, not stirred., page-7

@Makattack & @Umizoomi

Thanks for bring to light such important points!

I found @peaceAKKI to have addressed these issues excellently in the previous post.

However, I should emphasize that from my perspective, the derisking I've mentioned is cumulative. Compared against the market, the relative risk, again my perspective, is minimal.

My main concern is not positive phase 2 results, as the phase 2a results have already been released. My main concern is production. If Patrys can indeed produce at scale on trees, this will be disrupting. No?

Safety has been shown for 10yr data. Again, less risk.

I must admit that "chinglish" made me chuckle!

Most appreciated!