Yet you believe,all life came from a rock,a non living inanimate organism,turned into a living organism,just because you put so many zeros into the mix of how long ago it was,thats supposed to make it all plausible?sounds like fairy tale and myth to me!
WOW, you know me..... to paraphrase yourself. I said that I don't know how life started so why do you keep on bringing this up? I'm happy to admit it when I don't know - are you, or do you know everything.
If your ramblings are correct, no process could start and develop life, so must be an illusion because any process would break your version of the second law of thermodynamics.
Confronted by all these truths, evolutionists like whereru have had to take refuge in a mangling of the second law of thermodynamics, saying that it holds true only for "closed systems," and that "open systems" are beyond the scope of this law.
evolutionists like whereru have had to take refuge in a mangling of the second law of thermodynamics
Who brought up the second law of thermodynamics? You accuse me of taking refuge in a mangling of the second law of thermodynamics. That is exactly what you did.
Evolutionists like whereru, hold that the world is an open system:
that it is constantly exposed to an energy flow from the sun, that the law of entropy does not apply to the world as a whole, and that ordered, complex living beings can be generated from disordered, simple, and inanimate structures.
Yes, Einstein, I mean Bowral. Entropy applies to a closed system in that it is the overall system that becomes disordered - parts (the open systems) can become more ordered at the expense of others. Rewrite the laws of physics if you like.
Sorry I only skim read your dribble at this stage, because judging by your complementary remarks your are clearly only interested in points scoring. My only regret is that I spent so much time answering your questions.
I now have better things to do with my time and won't bother to respond anymore.
