whereru, you opened this thread,which is a shoot off from anoth thread on the same subject,where everytime you asked me a question,i en devoured to answer it
You said evolution was an open theory i refuted that with my answer etc
pmd3nka , said
"Creation is an irrefutable hypothesis."
Not correct,but i see the point you are trying to make here,we are actually talking about intelligent design here,because we are not talking about the origin of life on this thread,but the process/processes life has and is.No one just to answer this,is suggesting to JUST accept creation when that is the subject,by blind faith as whereru would try to have you believe,but by presenting the evidence of an intelligence behind life,we come to the scientific conclusion,that information obviously intelligently and scientifically proceeds from intelligence
"As such, it is not Scientific. The theory of evolution, like quantum theories, relativity etc, is refutable and thus scientific."
No,as it is not demonstrable as we have on more than one occasion provided evidence for,its accepted by blind faith
"Apologies if all this has been stated before - the thread has only just come to my attention."
Apology accepted,as i would suggest reading throught this debate,so that you have both sides of the issue,so that you may like to join in,also have alook at the other threads on this issue ie easter coming etc
regards
Evolution has nothing to say about creation, and vice versa
