"And once tenant moves in its old stock - then it becomes mismanaged and taxpayers pays more. Too simplistic!"
Hence NG is allowed to the owner who purchase the property NEW.
"Because contrary to popular opinion a lot of investors do build new houses."
But the vast majority do not. They don't deserve a tax subsidy for using existing housing stock as a speculative vehicle.
- Forums
- Property
- negative gearing rorting the guts out of oz
negative gearing rorting the guts out of oz, page-28
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 116 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)