relisting, page-3

  1. 289 Posts.
    lightbulb Created with Sketch. 1
    That is disgraceful.
    Not good enough. They should have told shareholders this before this point. Why? Isn't 2 years enough time to get their sh*t together. Sorry, I am one of the original true believers but this smells bad. I've been through all this bull*hit before with several other companies and the stalling and crap is all too familiar.
    Starting to feel we are all in a bit of trouble. Hate to say it but the company secretary replying to a shareholder saying they will re-list as soon as possible is a crock. They promsed us these re-listing dates and have had plenty of time. Like a dead fish in the moonlight-it shines but it stinks! Not fu*king happy. Will ring and abuse the fu*k out of them tomorrow. I've had enough of this bull*hit
 
arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch. arrow-down-2 Created with Sketch.