trademanic why wasn't that monkey thread taken to Science seeing it was based only on a christian sects bible interpretation dismissing scientific evolutionary theory?
you are aware trademanic that the issue of muslim immigration and muslim 'bashing' by both secular and religious has been moved to discussion from general to either here or politics forum?
When beta HC starts ,threads started in 'inappropriate' sections will be able to be picked up hollis boulus and transported to the moderator determined appropriate place.
gilded is explaining the initial post and it's philosophy angle.
the discussion seems to be that the Gay Philosophy of right of marriage is ignoring the imperative that children need a mother and a father but the question is if they have no biological mother and father must they have only female and male "role models" as adopted 'parents'?
so as far as i know the bible doesn't cover this other than Mr Gordon's bit about Jehovah is your Father if your [real] parents abandon you so is that a position that Gays have no hope in nuturing? Leave it to Jehovah? suffer the little children hey?
look don't have time today to contribute my opinions to debate. Just hope that the usual suspects don't wade in with cut'n'paste quotes "Philosophy".
cheerio [a qld expression of see/catch ya later ddzx unlike cheers right?]
