I am trying to avoid assuming by getting you to clarify what I thought you believe.
"In fact he was an evolutionist or a atheist long before he was a creationist. He changed his belief as he could find not one scrap of factual evidence to support the lie."
I have been asking if you think Darwin was a liar because of this comment in an earlier post of yours. To me there is a big difference between lying and being wrong or mistaken. I would also question a persons understanding if they believe a theory is ment to be a truth.
What is in your heart when you compare Darwin to Adolf Hitler?
Yes Darwin was probably sincere and may not have been correct but as I mentioned above he presented a theory not a law or truth. He was a scientist trying to find an explanation for the development of life. Hitler was probably sincere in his book in developing a master race and empire that led to a world war with 10s of millions of lives lost and unimaginable suffering. I cant see any comparison.
- Forums
- Philosophy & Religion
- evolution is for monkeys
evolution is for monkeys, page-307
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 96 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)
Featured News
Featured News
The Watchlist
LPM
LITHIUM PLUS MINERALS LTD.
Simon Kidston, Non--Executive Director
Simon Kidston
Non--Executive Director
SPONSORED BY The Market Online