Either the JV agreement was broken or it wasn't. AGS would love to own 100% then they could put it on the market and sell to the highest bidder.
Well really it is theft as Q were meant to act in good faith to earn their 75%. If they haven't acted in good faith then they have acquired their share of the lease in a conduct which is misleading and deceptive.
Full restitution is the judge's only option imo.
- Forums
- ASX - By Stock
- AGS
- facing the music
facing the music, page-31
-
- There are more pages in this discussion • 12 more messages in this thread...
You’re viewing a single post only. To view the entire thread just sign in or Join Now (FREE)