joke, page-69

re: grades/tonnage/prices/demand/supply/profit I just read your ridiculous post on one liners. This is what you said in your previous post, prior to posting your one-liner
"Enjoy well balanced discussion-not one liners"
You are a total contradiction.
BTW
>I never asked for your advice on what to buy or not to buy. Yet, you're hell bent on giving it.
>I never asked you what books I should or should not read. But this hasn't stopped you from spouting off titles.
>I never asked you what qualifications one needs in order to be successful. Yet you claim that I even brought up the subject of qualifications. Yet it was you that first spouted off your qualification and proceeded with the following statement "I did not through all my qualifications at you as that will only blind you even more"
Well I'll take my chances. I'm still waiting to view these great qualification of yours. No doubt just a one liner that you thought you would throw in. Strangely, or maybe not, even on this point you are a contradiction for in one post you say "No PhDs with relevent experience, no big company experience with a speciality in this region. Nothing that makes them special as individuals to trtansform results achieved to date." The implication in this quote is that you need a PhD in order to be special as an individual. I do not have any special qualifications and I have minimal education in order to help me get by. But I do like reading and will often take my lead as to whether to invest in a company based on the ability of the management team to make sound decisions. It is my belief that without good leadership a company is doomed. I don't consider myself any more or less special than anyone else that has or has not got a PhD. However, in your next post you obviously feel that you have to include an exception for it turns out that managers are exempt from your criteria for being special "Sure you don't need a PhD to be a good manager" ( a bit like George Orwell. Animal Farm "All animals are equal, but some animals are more equal than others")
>You claim I misquote when I refer to Reuters stating that analysts have been bearish on copper for years on the grounds that this is not what you heard when you attended a conference. Well, perhaps you didn't hear right. I don't know!. But don't accuse me of misquoting.
Write to Reuters if you have an issue with this. Reuters reported "Indeed, almost every analyst covering the metals has been bearish on copper, and forecasts for 2006, 2007 and beyond are well below current prices. The forward curve seems to be challenging the dubious arguments of the soothsayers, however, and has firmed up very nicely in the last two months. The December ’06 contract is finally above $2 per pound, and even December ’07 has moved up smartly to the $1.78 level."
>You have shown an abyssmal lack of time management skills in making close to 20 posts on a stock that you so obviously think very little of. Although, I have noticed today you made a number of posts on LAF. But you could not stop yourself from bagging the Philippines and the Filipino people in an attempt to pump this stock.
The Philippines is a lovely country and so are its people. LAF is sitting on a good reource, and will probably do quite well. Just give it time, but the media and the people of the Philippines are entitled to ask and demand as many safety measures as they wish. It is their country and they can develop their resources when and if they see fit.

The words arrogant and bigot springs to mind.
I could go on, but you're simply not worth it.