palmer becomes even more irrelevant, page-18

public servants probably includes anybody who is on the public payroll - so that probably includes policemen, nurses teachers etc etc, council staff, abc staff, state public servants.

one way or the other, there is probably already a good number of people who have a good ppl - a lot of large businesses also have ppl.

watso recalls looking through the gmh website once, and under "career opportunities " (or work for holden or something similar), they also were offering a good ppl - that is probably where a part of the billions of government funding went.

no doubt that when palmer hires staff, and if any of them are female, they they will get the good public servant ppl.

palmer increasingly shows that he is not fit to be a member of parliament.

if the ppl is reduced to %50,000, then one wonders if high paid public servants will be worse of, than their current scheme - watso cannot recall what the public servant scheme is worth, but maybe it is about 3 months at full pay - which will be worth a minimum of $50,000 - plus some people might view the loss of income for another 3 months, as being a disadvantage.

oh - public service PPL, should not be any better than abbotts ppl - which should be a universal scheme